2011 has been a big year for social – we saw Governments get toppled in part due to social organization, meetups & sharing, President Obama do a town hall via Twitter questions, Facebook announce a digital version of your life story and a half dozen major IPOs that show there’s real money being made. But while all of this attention has really taken social out from behind the shadows to show its importance, it’s also made a lot of people jump to meet sudden expectations rather taking the time to dive in to what it is that makes social so powerful – conversation.
So whether you want to call it a “New Year’s resolution” or whatever, let’s put the billboards, the fan counts and the hyped up programs aside and take social back to what makes it actually work.
Enough with the Giant Banner Splash Pages
There’s nothing wrong with wanting to explain your page’s value but somewhere in the process we went from curated content to full page ads and fangating people out of our content. If the goal of social is to engage current customers and win over prospects, the first thing people should see is that we are actually there for a dialogue… not to sell. No one should have to “like” to ask a question.
So keep the intro page up but make it about what your page is about, if you can pull off the development hours, bring some user generated content into the fold to show that it’s not just what are selling, it’s what people are saying and sharing.
Don’t Just Broadcast, Join the Conversation
Remember when your executives came up to you with that first Comcast Cares news story and asked what “we’re doing with this social stuff”. Comcast didn’t get all that press because they launched a Twitter account and started posting their latest shows times and offers… they got it because they jumped into conversations and not just ones aimed at them, they found people talking about them who didn’t even know they were on Twitter, and answered their questions too.
That was a good idea, in fact, it was just the tip of the iceberg as brands pushed the boundary to stop just being logos and become people who could ask questions of their own, follow up with a little personality to a comment and get into the conversation as a participant.
So while Twitter has been taken over by many support teams, Facebook and Google Plus’s comment after comment approach makes things hard to sort the more you grow, let’s get back into the mode of responding… to support, to questions, to positive statements and show our customers that we’re actually online too. If you’ve ever tweeted back at 2am or posted a Facebook reply on Christmas day about how to configure the remote for the new stereo you know just how well it goes over.
Share what others share, not just what is on that week’s marketing calendar
Facebook renamed them to likes [“likers”??], Twitter says followers, Google Plus has circles but most of us still them Fans because that’s what our goal was always to get. People with a passion and interest in our brand and guess what, we found them, often times a lot of them and they share content right and left way more than we could ever make or keep up with. But leaving it at the bottom of a wall or a public but directed reply is like walking right over the hundred dollar bill to get the five.
While little Timmy may not have the reach of the big name bloggers / celebs they both influence on their own level and both have a purpose to being reshared… one to get hype and attention, the other to make it very real, authentic. Let’s leverage them all but not in a 90 brand / 9 celeb / 1 user kind of way. It’s like the idea of making a “fan of the week / month / year” and putting them into the profile picture – it was a good idea when it first came out and it’s spread but why stop at one person, once a month?
Feature those contributions, those quotes, the fan photos. Heck, let’s go back to making that the feature of our page… albums about what fans are doing encourages more fans to share which ups our EdgeRank on Facebook and our Retweets on Twitter so we get seen more. Transparency Visibility… can’t go wrong there.
If you’re going to push offers, don’t expect interaction
The stats show just how big the gap has become… brands think it’s about talking, consumers about deals & giveways and with the messages out there, why wouldn’t they?
There’s nothing wrong with saying your page is about discounts, another way of accessing your email or print coupon offers, but if you say that you have to realize that’s always going to be what your fan expects. There’s no magical shift that happens when someone clicks “like” that makes them actually like your brand for what you stand for and do… instead it’s a matter of how you got them hooked that determines what they expect and who they are.
If you want engagement, if you believe that the ROI of social media is that you can actually talk to your customer and have them talk to their friends instead of just screaming in their direction with an ad, don’t sell something else to lure people in – it doesn’t work. Instead explain exactly what your page does, how you’re here to answer, to share, to build that community.
That doesn’t mean you should be offer-less but when you a follow a truly premium brand who rarely discounts, does only the most select giveaway and focuses on content, sharing, conversation 95% of the time, each offer becomes special and something people clamor for. It’s no coincidence that the less you discount, the more people react… share… and buy.
Go for interactions, not counts
And with that we’re brought to perhaps the most frustrating point… ending this quest for counts. Is having more reach good? Tempting as it is to say yes, that’s the old world broadcast thinking… what’s good is having the right reach. Unless you’re Coke, Pepsi or P&G and literally have a place in every household, there’s no way you’re going to get truly interested followers let alone fans from having “everyone” follow you.
One day Twitter and Facebook and Google and every other tool will have a great way to segment contributors, actual customers, serious prospects and general followers but right now they are all one population. That means they bring up or pull down each other — whether it’s in visibility through systems like Facebook’s Edgerank, the strength comments on a discussion or just having other fans motivated enough to reply back so you can get that peer to peer cycle going. Having more fans that are less connected hurts you under the social model.
So sure, measure your growth in fans but don’t do it on the basis of what the guy down the street has, do it on how you’re using the most organic, the most targeted, the most appropriate sources to find people who will like because they actually like your brand or are teetering on the edge of being there and looking for another fan to push them over.











![Photo of Ted Sindzinski [small]](/images/me.jpg)