Resolve to Make Your Social Media Program Social Again

2011 has been a big year for social – we saw Governments get toppled in part due to social organization, meetups & sharing, President Obama do a town hall via Twitter questions, Facebook announce a digital version of your life story and a half dozen major IPOs that show there’s real money being made. But while all of this attention has really taken social out from behind the shadows to show its importance, it’s also made a lot of people jump to meet sudden expectations rather taking the time to dive in to what it is that makes social so powerful – conversation.

So whether you want to call it a “New Year’s resolution” or whatever, let’s put the billboards, the fan counts and the hyped up programs aside and take social back to what makes it actually work.

Enough with the Giant Banner Splash Pages

There’s nothing wrong with wanting to explain your page’s value but somewhere in the process we went from curated content to full page ads and fangating people out of our content. If the goal of social is to engage current customers and win over prospects, the first thing people should see is that we are actually there for a dialogue… not to sell. No one should have to “like” to ask a question.

So keep the intro page up but make it about what your page is about, if you can pull off the development hours, bring some user generated content into the fold to show that it’s not just what are selling, it’s what people are saying and sharing.

Don’t Just Broadcast, Join the Conversation

Remember when your executives came up to you with that first Comcast Cares news story and asked what “we’re doing with this social stuff”. Comcast didn’t get all that press because they launched a Twitter account and started posting their latest shows times and offers… they got it because they jumped into conversations and not just ones aimed at them, they found people talking about them who didn’t even know they were on Twitter, and answered their questions too.

That was a good idea, in fact, it was just the tip of the iceberg as brands pushed the boundary to stop just being logos and become people who could ask questions of their own, follow up with a little personality to a comment and get into the conversation as a participant.

So while Twitter has been taken over by many support teams, Facebook and Google Plus’s comment after comment approach makes things hard to sort the more you grow, let’s get back into the mode of responding… to support, to questions, to positive statements and show our customers that we’re actually online too. If you’ve ever tweeted back at 2am or posted a Facebook reply on Christmas day about how to configure the remote for the new stereo you know just how well it goes over.

Share what others share, not just what is on that week’s marketing calendar

Facebook renamed them to likes [“likers”??], Twitter says followers, Google Plus has circles but most of us still them Fans because that’s what our goal was always to get. People with a passion and interest in our brand and guess what, we found them, often times a lot of them and they share content right and left way more than we could ever make or keep up with. But leaving it at the bottom of a wall or a public but directed reply is like walking right over the hundred dollar bill to get the five.

While little Timmy may not have the reach of the big name bloggers / celebs they both influence on their own level and both have a purpose to being reshared… one to get hype and attention, the other to make it very real, authentic. Let’s leverage them all but not in a 90 brand / 9 celeb / 1 user kind of way. It’s like the idea of making a “fan of the week / month / year” and putting them into the profile picture – it was a good idea when it first came out and it’s spread but why stop at one person, once a month?

Feature those contributions, those quotes, the fan photos. Heck, let’s go back to making that the feature of our page… albums about what fans are doing encourages more fans to share which ups our EdgeRank on Facebook and our Retweets on Twitter so we get seen more. Transparency Visibility… can’t go wrong there.

If you’re going to push offers, don’t expect interaction

The stats show just how big the gap has become…  brands think it’s about talking, consumers about deals & giveways and with the messages out there, why wouldn’t they?

There’s nothing wrong with saying your page is about discounts, another way of accessing your email or print coupon offers, but if you say that you have to realize that’s always going to be what your fan expects. There’s no magical shift that happens when someone clicks “like” that makes them actually like your brand for what you stand for and do… instead it’s a matter of how you got them hooked that determines what they expect and who they are.

If you want engagement, if you believe that the ROI of social media is that you can actually talk to your customer and have them talk to their friends instead of just screaming in their direction with an ad, don’t sell something else to lure people in – it doesn’t work.  Instead explain exactly what your page does, how you’re here to answer, to share, to build that community.

That doesn’t mean you should be offer-less but when you a follow a truly premium brand who rarely discounts, does only the most select giveaway and focuses on content, sharing, conversation 95% of the time, each offer becomes special and something people clamor for. It’s no coincidence that the less you discount, the more people react… share… and buy.

Go for interactions, not counts

And with that we’re brought to perhaps the most frustrating point… ending this quest for counts. Is having more reach good? Tempting as it is to say yes, that’s the old world broadcast thinking… what’s good is having the right reach. Unless you’re Coke, Pepsi or P&G and literally have a place in every household, there’s no way you’re going to get truly interested followers let alone fans from having “everyone” follow you.

One day Twitter and Facebook and Google and every other tool will have a great way to segment contributors, actual customers, serious prospects and general followers but right now they are all one population. That means they bring up or pull down each other — whether it’s in visibility through systems like Facebook’s Edgerank, the strength comments on a discussion or just having other fans motivated enough to reply back so you can get that peer to peer cycle going. Having more fans that are less connected hurts you under the social model.

So sure, measure your growth in fans but don’t do it on the basis of what the guy down the street has, do it on how you’re using the most organic, the most targeted, the most appropriate sources to find people who will like because they actually like your brand or are teetering on the edge of being there and looking for another fan to push them over.

Social Media managers: Who has the keys to your customer?

I’m not sure what prompted it but there have been all sorts of coverage over a “bug” in Facebook that allows admins to remove each other from a page essentially letting someone go “rogue” and steal a page [this has been the case for well over a year now but that’s besides the point].

Anyone fearful of this has a much bigger problem in their hands.
Losing access to your page to a rogue employee would be annoying but know what’s worse – having that employee post up a disparaging, profane or competitive comment to all your followers – and any “admin” can do that right now.

For most brands social has grown out of the corners: a motivated marketing coordinator, customer service rep, etc. While this has lead to some of the most authentic and impactful campaigns out there, if you can’t trust an employee with the keys, don’t trust them with the customer.

Control is perhaps the biggest decision company’s face around social. Who do you let speak for you… PR? An agency? The guy who tweets about his band all day long? Lots of advice exists on how to make a decision but no matter who you pick realize that they don’t just have access, they have your brand in their hands so give that decision, and your relationship/ compensation / ask of them more than a second thought.

p.s. Social Media Management providers: I’ve suggested better tiered management in the past but haven’t seen it yet… opportunity knocks.

15 Best Practice Programs & Policies for Boosting Ecommerce Sales

At over 8% of US retail sales, ecommerce is no longer the wild west. Earning a sale requires a great offer but price isn’t the entire story…. customer expectations have grown and with so many options, insuring confidence, trust and validation are all vital elements to standing out ahead. While there’s no single golden key to success, and what works for one won’t always work for another, here’s a quick list of 15 vital to medium items which every etailer should consider for their site.

48-hour Shipping Window –Vital

Description: Guarantee items ship within 2 business days. Explicitly mark any item that takes longer to ship out so it’s clear up front that there is a delay.

Purpose: Customers expect items to head to them quickly. If items will take longer to ship from the warehouse, the entire process is slower. This leads to perception of long lead time, returns.

Display True Inventory – Vital

Description: Show accurate inventory levels on products updated in or near real time.

Purpose: Customers expect items to be in stock when they are able to order them. Sending notifications of an out of stock after the fact should be rare as it is a very negative experience. Keep any delays or stock issues up front and easily understood before the order.

Safe Shopping with Trust Seals – Vital

Description: Show a trust mark from Versign or a similar agency indicating the safety of ordering.

Purpose: With phishing, scams and a host of other online fraud, customers are often wary of unknown ecommerce sites. Adding trust marks from reputable sources helps alleviate this concern.

Cost: $200 / year for Verisign seal

Automated Shipping Notifications – Vital

Description: Automatically send email with tracking number when a product ships.

Purpose: Ground shipping can take up to 10 days so knowing an order has shipped becomes critical to insuring confidence and avoiding calls. These automated emails are also a strong opportunity to continue the relationship with the customer with a relevant support or brand related message.

Free Shipping with Qualified Order – High

 

“In a 2010 test, research firm comScore found that free shipping orders spent $125 vs $86 on average. That’s a 45% increase per order!” – comScore Research, December 2010

 

Description: Offer free ground shipping on all orders over $100

Purpose: Considered a “fee”, free shipping has long been found to increase conversion rates even if the price is seemingly built in versus other sites. Free shipping can be considered a marketing cost and should be tested aggressively at different levels to see lift.

Cost: Cost of shipping. May be mitigated by bringing some or all into product price.

User Reviews – High

Some 70% of Americans say they consult product reviews or consumer ratings before making a purchase” – Business Week, October 2009

Description: Allow users to read or write reviews on each product placing star ratings on product detail and line list pages for user to user validation.

Purpose: User reviews have replaced the voice of the brand and often even experts as the go to source of validation for products. Providing sophisticated reviews is a must do.

Cost: PowerReviews starts at $99 / month. Shopping cart integrated solutions are no cost.

30 Day Hassle Free Returns – High

Description: Visibly state a 30 day return policy with no questions asked.

Purpose: Buyer’s remorse is one of the top concerns shopping online as you can not truly experience the product. Offering a hassle free return alleviates this concern for many customers.

Cost: Potentially increased return rate.

Rich Product Descriptions – High

Description: Provide a detailed description of each product painting a picture of the experience the system will deliver with rich, warm terms along with the necessary technical specifications to support super-customers & show masses the numbers are there. Keep descriptions consistent across products to make model comparisons easy.

Multiple Images – High

Description: Provide 5+ images per product, ideally with in-environment application shots to show the feel a product will use. Shoot any connections / adapters / labels that may exist and insure scale is visible for context. Keep shots consistent across products to make model comparisons easy.

Holiday / Peak Season Shipping Chart – High

Description: Provide ground / 3 day / overnight shipping cut offs for major holiday periods

Purpose: During peak events like Christmas, Valentine’s Day, Father’s Day, etc. shipping windows become critical and if it’s not clear an item will make, customers will select alternative options. Providing a shipping chart insures there is confidence in buying and reduces complaints if items do not arrive in time.

Social Interactions – High

Description: Facebook / Twitter / Google Plus social sharing widgets on product pages.

Purpose: Allows users to share a product they like in just one or two clicks with no effort. The counts of shares one each product also serve as social validation showing the product is liked.

Visible Alternative Purchasing Channels – Medium

Description: Show additional purchasing options from retail & etail partners

Purpose: Whether it’s combining orders with other products or accessories, or simply being able to go to a store and test a product, customers often seek alternative purchasing options. The customer will ultimately abandon if their channel is not supported so earning any sale is better than [unsuccessfully] forcing a direct sale.

Visible Phone Number – Medium

Description: Show the store’s website prominently on all pages in the header or footer.

Purpose: The presence of a number helps insure confidence that the store is accessible and trustworthy. In the event of an ordering issue this helps give a direct path to resolution.

Write a Review Shipper Insert & Email – Medium

Description: Place an insert into product orders encouraging a review of the item. Follow up with an automated email 2 weeks after shipment. [Kick it up: Offer off 10% on future order for comments and restate support & return policies.]

Purpose: Drives additional reviews & starts loyalty building as the customer returns to the site and provides data on their experience. Chance for issue resolution if the rating is negative.

Third Party Coupons – Depends

Description: Provide 5-15% off discount coupons via third party affiliates [requires affiliate program like Commission Junction].

Purpose: Many website visitors will search for “brand + coupons” or discover brands starting at a coupon site and a small savings may be the determining factor in winning orders. Smart couponing can be limited to particular SKUs and used to move overstock / last generation models creating a win-win.

Cost: Affiliate program provider fees plus per-sale cut + coupon discount.

It’s not all about social media: Advertising: the forgotten, but necessary, campaign partner.

With the buzz out there, it’s easy to see why brand owners, marketers and of course the hotly contested social media experts, are extremely amped up about social, social, social but just because social is right in front of us doesn’t make it the only game in town. In fact, if you take a social only approach chances are you’re handicapping your campaign from the start.

Social media, while powerful, authentic and important only works if people see what you’re doing and that’s where advertising comes in as a symbiotic partner

The problem we see today is that people expect everything to just go viral. We’ve all be asked [told?] to make a viral video; to make a product get “out there” with sharing alone. The reality is that very few products even have a chance to “go viral”. For every blendtec or old spice is a thousand more brands with a good product that simply isn’t what people want to share around the web. That’s why on any given day the top 50 YouTube videos include one product related videos. Yup, one.

Advertising is the dependable version of viral

Instead of asking “how do I make this ‘go viral’”, which is something you can’t control or guarantee, you need to ask yourself: “how do I take something that is credible, authentic and trustworthy and make it get exposed”. This is why advertising becomes remains so important in an era of social media – advertising is your guaranteed source of visibility that insures success whether or not a viral pickup takes place.

Social Media changes how you advertise

Google AdWords, Targeted Banners, Lead Generation Campaigns, Facebook Ads. Advertising has been used to sell your brand’s value under your voice, with your credibility attached. Social integrates into this chain to make your ads authentic and stand out [at least until everyone gets on board].

Rather than saying “50% off on the Amazing Widget” say “50% off on the 5-star rated Widget” with quotes from reviews visible around the ad unit. Rather than a stock photo of actors enjoying their new RV pull in a video from your Facebook campaign of a real family talking about their experience with a link to read more stories. Bring the same transparency you have on your reviews, Facebook page, user community and other social features right out and into your advertising – the more real time and authentic, the better.

Product packaging is another great place to bring social to life and get in front of the customer. Think about two boxes with nearly the same product, one has a summary rating, an expert rating and a QR / RFID / short url link to read more reviews while the other doesn’t even have a mobile friendly site. Even at a higher price the brand willing to put it all out there is worth a closer look. Mobile has become far too prevalent to think you can hide or out impulse research, so instead beat the customer too it.

Don’t assume that simply because you have UGC on your website or social channels people are going to find it. You need to tell them it’s there.

Counterfeits and social media reputation. An unlikely pair and yet a very real issue.

As articles continue to popup like Tory Burch’s win of $165 million against counterfeit selling sites, it’s clear just how big of a problem fakes from China and other developing nations are becoming but what’s not being discussed is the long brand implication they’re causing. I’m not talking market share or backdoor retailer purchases but rather opinion, advocacy and trust… The elements that modern brands are pushing so hard to build in the digital era.

Take a simple stat: 10%. For many brands, this is the minimum perceived impact to their markets are. Throw the significant impact that certainly has on sales aside and think customer experience… Few people know or ever discover they bought a fake and that means when the product fails or doesn’t perform as expected, it’s the same as if it was OEM.

1 in 10 customers buying a bad product. 1 in 10 having a terrible experience that can not be fixed. On a 5 star quality product, 1 in 10 means as much as half point drop in ranking and that’s assuming an even distribution.

What happens when customers start reading about D.O.A. issues? Products that sound terrible? Break in weeks?

Counterfeits are putting brand reputations online line, not to mention sales, and it’s time for marketers — including those in digital & social to act.

Solid execution: Delta gets smacked by soldier’s viral video, responds & changes policy in hours

So it’s only been a few hours since my post on Delta Airlines snafu with a group of soldier’s over baggage fees which turned into a viral / pr crises in just a few hours. Not only is the issue all over Twitter, Facebook and news sites but the video from the soldier’s has passed 200,000 views at last count.

So while my first post was really about empowering your ground-level employees to avoid bad customer experiences, whether they go viral or not, Delta has turned this into a great example of how you should handle social incidents.

While nothing can erase the negative impact this will leave, Delta’s social [and business] teams have been on their toes and acting quick to avoid making this into a “United Airlines Breaks Guitar” hit. Sure the PR will continue against them, more articles will come, it won’t be good but for an organization of this site and legacy, they’re playing their cards well. Let’s take a look…

  1. Yesterday a video was posted about an issue costing 38 soldiers $2800 in fees. As quick as the video became shared, Delta was in the mix with a response from “Rachel” apologizing & reaffirming the policy just before midnight EST.
  2. This morning Delta wakes up to see it’s full-blown-viral with major social network and media coverage creating over 200,000 YouTube views.
  3. By 1pm EST Rachel has an updated post with an updated policy: 4 checked bags for military traveling in economy on orders. The post reaffirms Delta’s involvement & programs for the military. And Rachel also threw in a personal statement as an Army wife and 12 year employee of Delta.

It’s been less than 24 hours and Delta has out two blog posts, has changed a world-wide policy and has allowed a personal message to float into the middle of it.

Like I said, this won’t end the problem and frankly, adjusting one policy does not fix the underlying issue where the system often prevents employee from making the “right” decision but Delta has taken a strong step to mitigating the issue and, more importantly, having a voice in the spread of it every step of the way.

By moving quickly blogs, tweets, mainstream media are all adjusting their story to mention Delta’s response and changes while the story is hot. As hard as it is, this is critical and very well executed by Delta… The longer you wait, the colder the issue and the less your response is seen so, from a social crises management perspective, kudos to their social team for being on top of the video, their business for being flexible enough to run and make a decision when one needed to be made — even if it’s just one gesture it’s a big one at the right time.

For more thoughts on crises communication management in a social world, check out my previous post about the Urban Outfitters social media incident.

Policy or not. Have you empowered your employees do to the right thing?

This morning I caught a post on the Huffington Post about how a group of soldiers who had come from Afghanistan and just come off an 18 hour layover had been charged $2800 in excess baggage fees [including one guy's weapon case] by Delta Airlines. Writing this post now it’s grown to be the Huff Pro’s homepage and the YouTube video of the soldier’s interactions [yes, they filmed it] now has over 170,000 listed views. It’s a rough day to be in Delta’s PR room.

But this isn’t just about Delta. It’s about how we as “corporate” set policies that potentially lock thousands of our employees into a position where they are forced to do things that get our brand to the front page of major news outlets in a social media disaster.

Without a little trust and room for flexibility, your employees can become your enemies.

Now that’s not to say Delta was wrong here. As they’re social team said in their response [good job being upfront on this on Delta, apologizing and publishing your facts]: they’ve got an agreement and a policy and have to think about scale. Similarly, just because someone has a video camera or threatens to blog or tweet or cause you negative PR, that doesn’t mean you should bend the rules in the least. When I hear about PR or Social activity as a threat my reaction is always to follow the letter of the rule… but what if the rule is bad? What if the video camera isn’t a threat but capturing a policy that reflects a brand who doesn’t get it? Can your employees act to do the right thing?

Airlines are an easy example because things so often go wrong, both in and out of their control. Rough for their social media managers, good for blogging on.

I can recall one instance where a flight I was going to take was clearly going to be rerouted [the airline we were going too closes at 11pm night, at 10 we hadn’t taken off]. When I suggested they call the shuttles in advance, the response was a very friendly, very polite: we’re not allowed… The rest of the line was irrelevant: good, smart employees without power may as well be replaced with… well kiosks.

This doesn’t end with bending rules either. How about creation? Just last night I was talking with a good friend about his job managing a profitable store in the retail service sector and what digital could do for them. Here you have a smart, dedicated manager looking push his brand forward and yet he’s afraid that growing the business will actually hurt him. Again there’s nothing wrong with corporate setting digital or social policies, running programs and centralizing – that’s a good thing. But when the supervising store manager has been given no social program, no idea who to contact about one and is fearful of just trying things, you’re losing opportunity.

We’ve all got bottom lines and scale to think about but sometimes the decision made at 30,000 feet doesn’t reflect what’s necessary right on the ground. Sometimes the desire to get all of the experts in a room and talk over the corporate strategy is stifling the local branch that is ready to act now and doesn’t know if they can.

It boils down to simple thing: trust. We ask a lot of our employees but don’t want to trust them with discretion and whether it’s the frontpage of one of the world’s largest news outlets or just an upset customer who tells their 135 Facebook friends, a lack of latitude can go a long way in hurting business.

Everyone wants to be your social sharing button.

Yesterday it was Twitter follow; today it’s Google +1. Add that to Facebook Like & Send, Tweet, LinkedIn Share and throw a basic email icon in for “old school” users and RSS for power ones and that’s 8 different options for your typical blog / site… and we haven’t even considered bookmarking or niche sites yet. The social button war is definitely on.

As a site owner it’s tempting to start on a redesign to incorporate them all; a little box or a row with nothing but icons to be sure you get every ounce of credit from every type of user but is that really the solution? Others have suggested a “share this” link opening up to a page of options that can grow to be nearly endless. I suggest something much simpler – follow your users to the right links.

Cooking blogs and adult humor sites with LinkedIn shares. Personalized shopping lists with bookmarking links. Dating sites with Tweet links. The mismatched attempts to get free traffic have become downright comical…

Rather than cramming all of the links you can on one site let’s all take the time to think about what options actually make sense for what content we’re serving up. What is the user there for? Who are they likely to spread a link too in their various networks? Just because the option exists doesn’t make it a good one to offer up on your site.

It doesn’t end with what may be used either, what is actually used is what matters. When your phone rings because John in sales always uses XYZ sharing service and told your boss it should be on the site that’s not enough. Spreading out your shares over 30 or 20 or even 7 services is diluting the weight. Size does matter. Spread matters too. As social sites do more to tweak their feeds to personalize and tailor content having weight on a few has become far better than a couple clicks on many.

We test offers. We test landing pages. We test add to cart buttons. Let’s try planning and testing our own sharing buttons with at least half the same rigor – what will people use not what can we ask them to use – social media is undoubtedly important but importance doesn’t negate a little planning.

10 tips to improve your Facebook post visibility and avoid killing your traffic!

In the first part of my post I explained how Facebook uses an algorithm called EdgeRank to help users see the posts they are most connected too. While intended to help end users, this system can kill as much as 70% of the visibility of a page, I even mentioned a client I’m working with who has seen their views go down despite a 5x growth in fans. So now that we’re agreed on the importance of having a good EdgeRank score, it’s time to discuss the Do’s & Don’ts to get there.

Now in all fairness you can’t escape EdgeRank as you grow; not even the top musicians and celebrities engage enough to escape unscathed. The core that follows your business on day one is only so big and in time you will get less interested fans coming in but there are things you can do to insure you don’t take a plunge like the company that contacted me did.

1. Target your fan acquisition efforts.

Whether it’s a sign on your restaurant tables, product insert or an ad on Facebook [which can be very good at getting relevant fans], ask yourself: is this message about acquiring someone who may be interested in my business or am I buying someone’s participation. Coupons, freebies all have to be measured – are they loyalty related [good as the customer has to actually like you to want to come back] or something a person may just find personally motivating like getting a onetime deal.

Using coupons helps get fans but limiting their frequency will drum up more discussion when you do have an offer.

2. Avoid cheap tricks, tools and overnight systems.

Whether it’s the promise from a so-called social agency to add a 100,000 fans through their “network” or having people become fans to help their favorite charity but then ending up uninterested in your brand which they now follow, tricks are bad. Even seemingly useful programs like a joint contest with a huge partner that fangates the entry system, can pile in people who just don’t care, don’t engage and pull you down. Anything that forces a LIKE should be questioned twice.

Best Buy isn't just promoting a contest -- they're using a huge a prize and an open-ended question to get a discussion going.

3. Closely monitor your post engagement and adjust.

Modern strategy says the customer now controls your brand perception and EdgeRank says they do own your Facebook success so while you have to get certain post types out there to drive your business, learn what format is working best in the nearly instantaneous testing ground that is your page. Focus on the post types that get responses – whether it’s a request for fans to upload a photo engaged with the brand, to vote on a new flavor, a cameo on a TV show, or a great coverage story that people like seeing you mentioned in.

4. Don’t overpost. Don’t overpost’ Don’t overpost.

Sure it’s exciting to have a huge event or perhaps you just have 5 different requests from different product teams in the same day but that’s no excuse to make updates right and left. People don’t want to be spammed. One message is ideal; two is ok, three if you have something great to share and never two within the same two hours. That means if you have an event cover the start and the end. Space them out, limit to 3, period.

5. Do respond to posts for pre-sales, support, and brand affirmation.

One of the factors people overlook in EdgeRank is page-owner participation. Facebook wants to see that you don’t simply post out but rather that you reply back to updates you generate and the comments your fans make. Be engaged; it’s what your fans expect anyways.

The North Face doesn't just monitor posts, as this post shows, they take cues to decide how to respond, even what language -- talk about personalized.

6. Do use geotargetting.

If you have an offer that excludes a state, don’t have users there see it – if they ignore it you lose relevancy, if they engage with it they’ll be negative – there’s no win to showing it to them. Facebook had fantastic targeting-in [if only they would add exclusion areas] which can apply to every regional offer, discount, or location specific event so use it liberally to limit posts, make localized versions and be as specific as time and your business allow for.

Facebook Geotargetting can be selected by country, state and city. Use it to make localized postings or share regional offers.

7. Stop thinking 9-5. Think your fan’s hours.

Studies have shown that brands that post “after hours” get as much as 20% higher engagement rates and if you know your audience, this can be much higher. When are your Fans on Facebook? When are they likely to be around your product? When are they bored with their phones [mobile is huge for commenting]? I’ve seen weekends, evenings, even Christmas have HUGE returns. Use time to your advantage to increase engagement.

Hot Topic has taken a human approach and built up a personality around their updates. They're not constrained by a clock and post when their team has something to say, the same times their customers tend to be online.

8. Do give people a reason to view your page, share it and contribute beyond a LIKE.

From apps to open ended questions to new updates shown through your page, there’s weight in views and even more in participation. The more reasons people have to leave the news feed and view, the more they write comments or post photos versus just “liking”, the more they are showing their interest in the page. Give them opportunities and reasons to speak up.

Comments vs LIKES on this Johnny Rockets post show that with a well worded post, you can get engagement even when talking about the brand.

9. Do encourage fans to tag your brand in photos.

No telling what this new feature will do to EdgeRank scores yet but it’s engagement, it’s brand focused, it’s something you can potentially get a lot of people doing easily with a clever post and that can’t hurt.

Nokia has been quick to use tagging to build out a new fan album which in turn is encouraging even more photo uploads and engagement.

10. Use the data given to you to monitor success.

Facebook’s is an end user site first but their business offering is growing daily so be mindful of the new tools they come out with and pay close attention to your insights tab – the numbers from views to engagements to active users matter – know them and use them to your advantage.

Facebook insights go beyond views. Pay attention to activity rates and the peaks to understand optimal timing / days for sharing. With a log you should be able to correlate each increase to an event or post.

At the end of the day EdgeRank is an attempt to replicate a human using each individual’s actions along with the collective fan base of a page, the actions of the page owner, and time to determine what “they” would most likely want to see first, second, or not at all. You have the benefit of being able to access the humans [your fans]– engagement is a two way street. If numbers slip, review your campaigns, your content strategy, throw in a few more engaging post types and don’t be afraid to ask – sometimes the most obvious issue is right there, waiting to be told to you.

And once you’ve got the score up, go walk into your manager’s room and explain how you’re readdressing your fan strategy to insure your brand is seen more by good fans rather than worrying about having more uninterested ones.

Related Reading

EdgeRank: The Secret Sauce That Makes Facebook’s News Feed Tick – Tech Crunch

6 Tips to Increase Your Facebook EdgeRank and Exposure - Social Media Examiner

EdgeRank: How Facebook Determines What Appears in the News Feed – GetElastic

What Does It Mean for Brands? – Social Media Today

Is @LinkedIn worth $8bn? Eh. As the biggest connector of professionals it’s certainly not online pet food.

Disclosures up front:  I’m not a financial analyst, mind reader or anything resembling a stock broker and as I didn’t buy in to LNKD at market open I’m just a bystander in this game. Normally I wouldn’t touch an IPO post for all those reasons and many more, but given that LinkedIn is now the biggest IPO since Google and trading at over 500 times its 2010 income, I think it’s worth spending a moment to talk about the value of LinkedIn as a game changer, not a stock.

 [ Wondering if it’s worth buying? If you want a financial answer go read a blog from someone qualified to discuss that. ]

What makes LinkedIn’s IPO unique to me and worth spending even a few minutes writing about is how different it and the web are versus a decade ago. I’m not suggesting that a 500+ times earning valuation is somehow better now but rather that LinkedIn sits in a class of businesses [not just websites] we didn’t have in the late 90s.

Back in the dotcom bubble [hopefully never to be referred to as the first internet bubble] we saw companies hit milestones relative to the web. It seemed impressive when Webvan or Geocities or Yahoo added a few million users and if you worked in the web, it was… those were big percentages of the active user base but they were tiny to the world or even to North America where most were focused.

LinkedIn’s is different. They aren’t operating on a scale of web impressive, they’re at 100 million: this is North America, even world impressive [see infographic timeline]. No business has connected more professionals about being professional than LinkedIn. Reach may not equate to billions in earnings or justify 8 billion in value this afternoon [again, not evaluating their stock here] but if you want to talk about influence, potential and value… LinkedIn can wake up and tell pretty much the entire working world something because they want too.

Facebook will be the same. Reaching over 10% of the world’s population on a weekly if not daily basis is something few businesses can say.  What happens if they wake up and decide to ask every user in the world to write a review of Ford? How much conversation, perception and potential impact could that have?

These are a few names who define how the world thinks and works. That we all use them every day, have them in TV commercials and have no qualms putting them on our own websites says just how much they are a part of our market already. Add to that the simple reality that these businesses that are bringing in cash and it’s different.

No wonder why the perception of value is so high – no matter what the price tag, these companies are game changers to our world. What that’s worth, if that will hold, if it’s safe is again, up for discussion.