Social Media Strategies: Who should respond? Customer service or marketing

We’ve all read the case studies about Comcast, Dell, Jetblue and a handful of other companies who have changed their business (or at least changed what the media said about their business) by engaging in social. But while it’s exciting to talk about getting your own strategy going and how to “blow up” your business social always come down to one simple question, whose going to respond and when?

On one hand you have your customer service team, a group accustom to working with customers, tasked with fixing problems and [hopefully] knowledgeable about your product, policies and other particulars.

On the other hand you’ve got marketing which is probably the group driving social and has the most access to specials, new campaign information and the juicy details the customer wants.

The problem with delegating out to customer service is that, unless you create new roles and train new staff, you’re responding 1 to 1 on a platform that’s seen by 1 to many. This may seem like a minor issue but when your response ends up on the front of a major blog it’s anything but. Marketing on the other hand is often out of touch with the details of the customer experience (and I’m saying this as a marketer) so getting into support requires learning those find points. Neither side is perfect.

The solution that I’ve always found to work best is the one that gets the customer what they want – the right answer, in the right format fastest. Whether this comes from marketing or customer service isn’t a matter of black or white, it’s a matter of who can do it and who can commit the time to checking Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, YouTube, Flickr, Your Blog, The Other Blog, the new video site, the old video site, the second twitter account and that one last blog all the time. If your entire customer service team is hourly it’s not going to be them. If your marketing team isn’t willing to get into the trenches they should stick to strategy.

Either way you slice it the best idea is always to carve out that person. This can be a new resource if budget allows or an existing repurposed one. New clearly has the advantage of being able to get trained and focus on nothing else but sometimes that long time employee who is looking for a new change of pace already has the insights to know how to answer the product questions.

What’s most important, the detail you can’t forget ever is that people who contact you through social are doing so because it’s the channel they chose to use. If your resource doesn’t check it frequently, doesn’t respond well or just ends up pushing them to other channels there’s no use in having them there so whoever you pick, they need to have the permission and backing of the company to go out, give answers and perhaps use a little different tone or brand than may be the status quo – after all, this is social media.

Social Media – It’s about the bloggers, it’s about the users

Just a quick post today to discuss something I think needs to go away – the unidirectional nature of social marketing. For many companies social media efforts are driven by one or two individuals who hear about trends on the news or from an article and turn to their marketing team barking orders. These orders generally take the shape of focusing on (a) bloggers, (b) facebook/myspace, (c) twitter or (d) an-in house community. If your company is anything like this it’s time to fight back.
Continue reading

Emerging Facebook trend: Emote / Avatar Tagging… a marketing opportunity?

Since it first launched Facebook’s photo tagging tool has often been used for in ways other than tagging who is in a photo. Sometimes you’d see tags of people who missed an event, other times objects tagged as people, or people tagged as other people all in the name of a joke, fun or to make a point. But lately a new trend has emerged that’s spreading like wildfire through networks — emote or pictorial tagging.

2533_656347607031_6024910_41589942_4745465_n

Continue reading